Haq Movie Review: Emraan Hashmi & Yami Gautam Deliver a Fearless, Soul-Stirring Story of Truth and Resistance

There are films that entertain, and then there are films that confront. Haq, directed by Suparn Varma and written by Reshu Nath, belongs firmly to the latter category. In a cinematic landscape where safe choices often overshadow risk, Haq arrives as a reminder of what Hindi mainstream cinema once stood for- courage, conviction, and storytelling rooted in uncomfortable truths.

Set in late 1970s and 1980s India, the film follows Shazia Bano, whose life is shaken when her husband abruptly divorces her through triple talaq and refuses to support her or their child after remarrying. What begins as a personal struggle soon ignites into a national conversation on women’s rights, justice, faith, and societal power structures. And the film does not shy away- not from the pain, not from the silence, not from the reality.

Direction & Cinematic Language

Suparn Varma’s direction is confident, mature, and strikingly self-assured. In an era where films are edited like trailers- cut every two seconds for attention- Haq deliberately resists. Varma allows scenes to breathe, to unfold with emotional truth.

The decision to use long, uninterrupted takes (four to seven minutes) is one of the film’s strongest artistic choices. The camera does not intrude or manipulate- it simply observes. The use of split diopter and center-focus blur shots elevates the film’s visual language and emotional resonance. And in that quiet observation, we feel like we’re in the room- standing inches away as relationships fracture and voices tremble.

This is cinema that respects its audience- trusting them to listen, not to be spoon-fed.

Writing & Character Depth

Reshu Nath’s writing is sharp, layered, and deeply empathetic. Every character- even the ones we want to dislike- has purpose, history, and emotional logic.

This is where the film truly shines: there is no hero, no villain- there are humans. And a clear lesson.

It echoes Aaron Sorkin’s golden rule of drama: Never write a scene where two characters agree.

And in Haq, every scene contains conflict- not for drama’s sake, but because that is how truth unfolds.

The screenplay uses “Show, Don’t Tell” masterfully. The widening emotional gap between the lead characters in Act One is conveyed through glances, silences, and distance- not just dialogue.

Performances

This is easily one of the finest performances of both Emraan Hashmi and Yami Gautam’s careers.

Emraan Hashmi delivers a performance of restraint, internal chaos, and lived-in authenticity. He never overplays, never softens- he humanizes.

Yami Gautam is extraordinary. Her resilience, vulnerability, and emotional exhaustion feel painfully real. This may genuinely be her career-defining performance.

The supporting cast- Sheeba Chaddha, Aseem Hattangady, Vartika Singh, and Danish Husain- are precisely cast and elevate every scene they inhabit.

What Works:

• Powerful storytelling: Haq fearlessly explores faith, justice, and gender with conviction- it’s unflinching, relevant, and emotionally charged.
• Strong direction: Suparn Varma brings maturity and restraint, allowing long, immersive takes that heighten emotional truth and realism.
• Sharp writing: Reshu Nath’s screenplay stays focused on the issue, balancing emotion with purpose. Sequences like Shazia’s final outburst or the “vegetables” scene stand out as masterfully written moments.
• Stellar performances: Yami Gautam delivers a commanding and emotionally resonant performance- one of her finest. Emraan Hashmi, Aseem Hattangady, and Sheeba Chaddha add gravitas and texture to the narrative.

What Doesn’t Quite Work

No impactful film is without imperfections- and Haq has a few that stand out:

1. Overuse of fade-to-black transitions occasionally breaks the emotional rhythm and pulls the viewer out of the moment.
2. Overscoring in key scenes that might have benefited from silence- the background music sometimes leans too loud or too present, tipping moments slightly toward melodrama instead of letting quiet speak.
3. An over-reliance on ethos and pathos over logos. The film is emotionally charged and morally powerful, but there are stretches where the narrative leans so heavily into grief and righteous pain that logical grounding occasionally slips. Some sequences feel more theatrical than cinematic, where emotional intensity overpowers structural clarity — especially during high-conflict exchanges.

Still, these flaws feel like creative choices made with conviction, not missteps made in uncertainty.

Verdict

Haq is a necessary film. It isn’t here to cushion, comfort, or please- it’s here to unsettle, because the truth it speaks has always been unsettling. It’s bold in its storytelling, uncompromising in its moral stance, and deeply humane in its performances.

This is the kind of Hindi cinema we’ve been missing: cinema that doesn’t just tell a story- it demands that you sit with it, feel it, and think about it.

And long after the final frame fades, you do.